Citizens Tool Kit Black Box Voting - America's Elections Watchdog Group blackboxvoting.org - caught on videotape
blackboxvoting.org - New Today!
SHORTCUTS: How to find what you're looking for
your donations are always needed and very much appreciated Visa - Mastercard - AMEX blackboxvoting.org - news blackboxvoting.org - investigations blackboxvoting.org Press Kit blackboxvoting.org forums blackboxvoting.org - contact us blackboxvoting.org - home
Forum Navigation
  Topics
  Log In
  Log Out
:
Forum Search
  New Today
  New This Week
  Advanced Search
  Tree View

Forum Account
  Edit Profile
  Register
  Forgot Password

Forum Tools
  Help/Instructions
  Policies

CLICK STATE TO SEE:

"WATCH LIST"
Marked with:



"OPEN & HONEST"
Marked with:





  ...

(US) 5/06 - Malvo and the War Debate...  
 

Black Box Voting » General discussion » (US) 2006 - General Discussion Archive » (US) 5/06 - Malvo and the War Debate « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Daniel Pride
Voting Rights Forum Participant
Username: Danpride

Post Number: 1
Registered: 05-2006

Best of Black Box? N/A
Votes: 0 (A keeper?)

Posted on Monday, May 29, 2006 - 9:29 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I am curious why none of the media covers the most important aspect of
the Malvo shootings. If you look at Newspapers on the dates when the
shootings are underway you discover something I find quite
interesting. The shootings begin to dominate the news the day before
the debate on the Iraq war starts and they catch them the day
after the declaration of war??? If you ask most people "do you
remember the debate about starting the second Iraq war", they will all
answer "yes of course". But if you followup with the question "name
one point in the debate, a speech by a Senator or where their senator
stood", nada.

Almost no one noticed any aspect of the most important debate in the
last 50 years?

And interesting and odd fact. No one has done a story on what the real
impact of the shootings were. It was to virtually eliminate the war
debate from the media.

The special forces background of the senior member of the pair also
seems to get short shrift.

Smells a little fishy to me based on what little I know about it. At
minimum its a very significant part of the story, i.e. that a common
murderer had such an impact on our political process. Why is nobody
covering this obvious fact?

Dan Pride
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Mike Copass
Voting Rights Forum Participant
Username: Votes_with_paper

Post Number: 40
Registered: 12-2004

Best of Black Box? N/A
Votes: 0 (A keeper?)

Posted on Tuesday, May 30, 2006 - 5:26 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

You raise valid points. The news cycle and presence of stories is apparently manipulated to push certain stories off the front page. I dont know if the malvo/sniper story could be counted in this... but the Capitol Hill shooting non-story Friday probably does.

In either case -- this thread has ZERO to do with voting issues -- so mods, either move it, or do what you do.
 

All original content on this website is Copyright (c) 2008-2009 by Black Box Voting. All rights reserved.
Forums powered by Discus Professional - www.discusware.com.
Original site and logo design is by Andy Markley - art101.com.