Citizens Tool Kit Black Box Voting - America's Elections Watchdog Group blackboxvoting.org - caught on videotape
blackboxvoting.org - New Today!
SHORTCUTS: How to find what you're looking for
your donations are always needed and very much appreciated Visa - Mastercard - AMEX blackboxvoting.org - news blackboxvoting.org - investigations blackboxvoting.org Press Kit blackboxvoting.org forums blackboxvoting.org - contact us blackboxvoting.org - home
Navigation
  Topics
  Log In
  Log Out
:
Special Search
  New Today
  New This Week
  Advanced Search
  Tree View

Your Account
  Edit Profile
  Register
  Forgot Password

Tools
  Help/Instructions
  Policies


  ...

Rate Post  
 

Keep this post in Best of Black Box?

    No    Yes

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

catherine_a
Frequent Voting Rights Forum Participant
Username: catherine_a

Post Number: 353
Registered: 12-2004

Best of Black Box? N/A
Votes: 0

Posted on Monday, June 6, 2005 - 9:40 pm:   

Very interesting. It shows the inevitability of inside jobs. It also shows the vulnerability that comes with trusting even highly-trusted staff.

This has implications re: voting machine equiment. It demonstrates the ill-advisdedness of introducing any system which demands more trust of inside staff even in counties as rigorous in their security precautions as Ion Sancho's was. It begs the question, why introduce a system that 1) requires much tighter--and more expensive--security precautions, 24/7/365 with NO exceptions; and 2) that even with this security precaution a trusted insider could still throw the whole system with little or no chance of being caught. Why indeed--unless you wanted to "throw" the system?!

One of my relatives did some work with a computer security company for a couple of years. He told me the vast majority of computer-related crime was from inside jobs. I think the percentage due to insiders was about 75% or more. He also said most of these crimes go unreported because companies do not want to let the public know about their vulnerabilities.
 

The public must be able to see and authenticate these four essential steps for an election to be public, democratic, and valid: (1) Who can vote (voter list); (2) Who did vote (3) The original count; (4) Chain of custody.