Citizens Tool Kit Black Box Voting - America's Elections Watchdog Group blackboxvoting.org - caught on videotape
blackboxvoting.org - New Today!
SHORTCUTS: How to find what you're looking for
your donations are always needed and very much appreciated Visa - Mastercard - AMEX blackboxvoting.org - news blackboxvoting.org - investigations blackboxvoting.org Press Kit blackboxvoting.org forums blackboxvoting.org - contact us blackboxvoting.org - home
Navigation
  Topics
  Log In
  Log Out
:
Special Search
  New Today
  New This Week
  Advanced Search
  Tree View

Your Account
  Edit Profile
  Register
  Forgot Password

Tools
  Help/Instructions
  Policies


  ...

Rate Post  
 

Keep this post in Best of Black Box?

    No    Yes

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

pacific_alien
Voting Rights Forum Participant
Username: pacific_alien

Post Number: 38
Registered: 12-2004

Best of Black Box? N/A
Votes: 0

Posted on Saturday, June 4, 2005 - 6:02 am:   

Greetings George,

A federal law would indeed be an appropriate tool, but I have grave doubts that this is achievable in the current environment.
New/revised vote legislation/contracts proposed in recent months at any level has appeared to be nearly as flawed as what it is meant to replace, perhaps even worse in some cases.
Look at machine purchase decisions alone, there's enough spin (lies) going on there to pretend that black is white. Robust solutions to the real problems are very hard to find in the propositions.
Hell we are in the middle of 2005. To ensure that the 2006 poll is not corrupt, new laws, systems and oversight will all need to be in place and tested/proven before the campaign begins. Even with my rose tinted spectacles on I can't see this as realistic. I also have concerns regarding whoever might be found responsible for any past bad behaviour is likely to still be driving the bus and determining it's route. I suspect there are preconditions to be met before proper change can occur at all.

I'm thinking it is now looking like the entire electronic system should be tossed out until some time when it is properly sorted and the people can be confident. Allowing another election to procede using a system proven to be seriously unsafe is plain dumb. It is time to call for a return to paper and pen with human counting, while all the research continues and durable remedies are sought. Right now it is even difficult to imagine a healthy machine system available for 2008. How many more crooked elections are enough?

If a car, a drug, food, or anything else was as unsafe as a voting machine it would be ordered off the market and recalled immediately with full refunds by the manufacturer. That is what is required nationally if there is to be a clean election in '06.

What do you think?

Cheers
PA
 

The public must be able to see and authenticate these four essential steps for an election to be public, democratic, and valid: (1) Who can vote (voter list); (2) Who did vote (3) The original count; (4) Chain of custody.