Citizens Tool Kit Black Box Voting - America's Elections Watchdog Group blackboxvoting.org - caught on videotape
blackboxvoting.org - New Today!
SHORTCUTS: How to find what you're looking for
your donations are always needed and very much appreciated Visa - Mastercard - AMEX blackboxvoting.org - news blackboxvoting.org - investigations blackboxvoting.org Press Kit blackboxvoting.org forums blackboxvoting.org - contact us blackboxvoting.org - home
Navigation
  Topics
  Log In
  Log Out
:
Special Search
  New Today
  New This Week
  Advanced Search
  Tree View

Your Account
  Edit Profile
  Register
  Forgot Password

Tools
  Help/Instructions
  Policies


  ...

Rate Post  
 

Keep this post in Best of Black Box?

    No    Yes

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bev Harris
Board Administrator
Username: Admin

Post Number: 5527
Registered: 12-2004

Best of Black Box? 
Votes: 4

Posted on Wednesday, August 9, 2006 - 4:29 am:   

Dan -- those are nice procedures but as we learned, won't necessarily work.

The Black Box Voting projects with the Hursti attacks on the Diebold op-scan machine hack the poll tape. The second one, which he did on Dec. 13, 2005, did a one-step manipulation of both the poll tape and the central tabulator results, using ONLY a memory card.

Also, you generally can't get the Statement of Votes Cast (the detail report from GEMS that breaks results out polling place by polling place -- the only way you can match up results from poll tapes to central tabulator. The SOVC is often not released at all unless you pay for it in a public records request, and generally they won't give it to you until AFTER the election is certified. There are some exceptions to this. In a large metro location that report is very large.

Random audits will not verify necessarily verify integrity either. One of the very dangerous things about the double set of books in GEMS is that it is possible to make the results wrong while any individual precinct you select will use the real numbers. That's because it allows you to de-couple the precincts with the totals. While it is true that the total does show up on the very last page of the SOVC report, as mentioned before that report is not made available in full until AFTER the spot checks are done, and besides, since the total is on the last page, they can easily say "we don't want to print out 1,000 pages, we're just printing the page that has the precinct result for the area we're spot-checking."

As is being seen in San Diego, even when you have ALL the reports they still don't necessarily match, nor do the spot-checks match (see Los Angeles, Judy Alter report) but they typically do not announce to either the candidates or the public that the spot check didn't match, nor do they seem to do anything about it.

We requested all the poll tapes back in the 2004 election. Small locations had them all, but the metro areas never had them all, due to poll worker error and also due to poor training of poll workers.

Astrogirl -- Welcome to Black Box Voting. If you will do one thing for us: We require real names here. Consider it an act of citizen leadership. I have enabled the "edit profile" function so you can go edit in your real name. Thanks.
* * * * *

"Regardless of size, just 1-3 people do all the work in any group. Better to have 10 groups of 10 people than one group with 100 people. That way, at least 10 people will get things done."
(-- John Brakey, an Arizona citizen)

You own your government, not the other way around. This is your task: Pick 1 thing and just DO IT. Then lead, mentor or organize 9 people to do the same thing.

Citizen Tool Kit to Take Back Elections:
http://www.blackboxvoting.org/toolkit.pdf
Begins 8/1/06

 

The public must be able to see and authenticate these four essential steps for an election to be public, democratic, and valid: (1) Who can vote (voter list); (2) Who did vote (3) The original count; (4) Chain of custody.