Citizens Tool Kit Black Box Voting - America's Elections Watchdog Group blackboxvoting.org - caught on videotape
blackboxvoting.org - New Today!
SHORTCUTS: How to find what you're looking for
your donations are always needed and very much appreciated Visa - Mastercard - AMEX blackboxvoting.org - news blackboxvoting.org - investigations blackboxvoting.org Press Kit blackboxvoting.org forums blackboxvoting.org - contact us blackboxvoting.org - home
Navigation
  Topics
  Log In
  Log Out
:
Special Search
  New Today
  New This Week
  Advanced Search
  Tree View

Your Account
  Edit Profile
  Register
  Forgot Password

Tools
  Help/Instructions
  Policies


  ...

AZ: Tucson: My New Voter Reg Card Del...  
 

Black Box Voting » Mailbag » AZ: Tucson: My New Voter Reg Card Delivered Opened Though Not Damaged « Previous Next »

  Thread Last Poster Posts Pages Last Post
  Start New Thread        

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

tj rasa
Voting Rights Forum Participant
Username: Trappedintucson

Post Number: 2
Registered: 7-2012

Best of Black Box? N/A
Votes: 0 (A keeper?)

Posted on Monday, July 16, 2012 - 12:59 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I am concerned about my new voter registration card received with the perforated seal opened as if it had been read. There was no damage whatsoever to the paper to indicate it might have occurred in transit. This is the first time this has happened to me either in AZ or in any other state in which I've lived.

I called the Pima Voting Office the day it was received (about 2 1/2 weeks ago) and expressed my concerns. I was told some pretty unbelievable things:

1.) The seal opens easily in the mail. [This is not true. It takes a bit to open the seal.]

2.) If anyone took my information they wouldn't be able to use it since ID is required. When I said I used early ballots due to no transportation, I was told not to worry, that if there was ANY indication that the signature was not mine they would call me. [I practically had to bite my tongue.]

3.) That I could do a 'walk-in' vote instead but would be given a provisional ballot rather than a regular ballot. I said I didn't want a provisional ballot. She said then I'd have to do the mail-in and trust them.

I told her I found it particularly creepy with the sort of fiery election coming up. Also, which I did not mention, I'd been doing a bit of whistle-blowing online in the months prior to receiving the opened registration card mailer.

I told someone who told me I should post this info here as a matter of record.

If anyone else has had this happen to them this year I hope they'll post about it.

Thanks very much.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bev Harris
Board Administrator
Username: Admin

Post Number: 11689
Registered: 12-2004

Best of Black Box? 
Votes: 1 (A keeper?)

Posted on Monday, July 16, 2012 - 1:14 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Hi TJ, and welcome to Black Box Voting.

When you say you use early voting, does this mean you are on a "permanent absentee list" so that they mail you an absentee ballot without doing a request for it each time? I am guessing this is the case, because they are saying if you walk in to vote you have to use a provisional.

I am interested in what information is on the card. For example: bar codes (how many and what do they look like); signatures; other codes; other personal information.

Am I correct in assuming it is a self mailer -- so that the seal is accessible without opening up an envelope?

We sent quite a lot of self-mailers out with a seal once, and we did notice on the return items that several were slit open. It could be the sorting equipment I suppose, though I don't quite see how that would neatly slit open the perforated seal. How big was the seal?

You are correct that their assurance that they will call you if the signature doesn't match is not reassuring.

I think Pima County uses Runbeck as a private outsourced ballot processing plant. That would be interesting to find out.

It's hard to discern whether this is a benign, isolated problem or a pattern indicating a risk to election integrity, but your concerns and your follow up call to the elections office are a good idea.

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Bold text Italics Underline Create a hyperlink Insert a clipart image

Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and moderators may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:
 

The public must be able to see and authenticate these four essential steps for an election to be public, democratic, and valid: (1) Who can vote (voter list); (2) Who did vote (3) The original count; (4) Chain of custody.