Citizens Tool Kit Black Box Voting - America's Elections Watchdog Group blackboxvoting.org - caught on videotape
blackboxvoting.org - New Today!
SHORTCUTS: How to find what you're looking for
your donations are always needed and very much appreciated Visa - Mastercard - AMEX blackboxvoting.org - news blackboxvoting.org - investigations blackboxvoting.org Press Kit blackboxvoting.org forums blackboxvoting.org - contact us blackboxvoting.org - home
Navigation
  Topics
  Log In
  Log Out
:
Special Search
  New Today
  New This Week
  Advanced Search
  Tree View

Your Account
  Edit Profile
  Register
  Forgot Password

Tools
  Help/Instructions
  Policies

CLICK STATE TO SEE:

"WATCH LIST"
Marked with:



"OPEN & HONEST"
Marked with:





  ...

Configuration Management and Voting S...  
 

Black Box Voting » Document Archive » Reports and Studies » U.S. reports (National in scope) » Configuration Management and Voting Systems « Previous Next »

  Thread Last Poster Posts Pages Last Post
  Start New Thread        

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Catherine Ansbro
Frequent Voting Rights Forum Participant
Username: Catherine_a

Post Number: 2097
Registered: 12-2004

Best of Black Box? 
Votes: 1 (A keeper?)

Posted on Sunday, April 16, 2006 - 1:03 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

http://www.votetrustusa.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1190&Itemi d=26
Configuration Management and Voting Systems
By John Washburn, VoteTrustUSA Voting Technology Task Force
April 14, 2006

This paper is directed to any person involved in the testing, certification, qualification, approval or purchase of election voting equipment. The paper covers why the esoteric field of configuration management (version control) is intimately and inextricably linked to the testing, certification, qualification, approval, purchase, delivery and auditing of election voting equipment. The paper describes:

• What is configuration management
• Why configuration management of software is difficult
• What is a physical configuration audit document
• What is minimum information which should be included in a physical configuration audit document
• How to use a physical configuration audit document to decide if your system is correct.

[See the link above to download the entire paper in pdf format. This is an outstanding piece of work by John Washburn.]
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bruce Sims
Frequent Voting Rights Forum Participant
Username: Ubetchaiam

Post Number: 742
Registered: 06-2005

Best of Black Box? N/A
Votes: 0 (A keeper?)

Posted on Sunday, April 16, 2006 - 5:20 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Yes, thank you John, such documentation is essential in having the issues clarified for judgment.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Joseph Hall
Voting Rights Forum Participant
Username: Joehall

Post Number: 63
Registered: 01-2005

Best of Black Box? N/A
Votes: 0 (A keeper?)

Posted on Monday, April 17, 2006 - 6:24 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

(Hi, I was unable to find an email addr. for John Washburn. Hopefully he'll read this or someone will eventually point him here.)

I'd like to thank you, John, as this is a great piece written in a particularly accessible style on an essential topic in election systems.

Some comments:

* The PDF version and the HTML version are different; the PDF is perhaps an earlier version? Specific things I noted:

** In the "File Fingerprints" section there is a missing link labeled with "WIKI URL".
** In item 2. of the same section it should probably read "(1 bit changed) file and *compared with* the hash value".
** In the "Comparing Systems" section there are two paragraphs (the 3rd and 4th paragraph) where the second sentence might should read: "This PCA is an enumeration of all the *differences* found in the [...]".
** In the same section, 7th paragraph: It says, "There are ? kinds of differences [...]" (in the HTML the "?" is replaced with "three").
** The PDF has no conclusion but the HTML does.

* You might want to point to the NSRL data set for voting which has very high-level PCA information for voting systems.

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Bold text Italics Underline Create a hyperlink Insert a clipart image

Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and moderators may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:
 

All original content on this website is Copyright (c) 2008-2009 by Black Box Voting. All rights reserved.
Forums powered by Discus Professional - www.discusware.com.
Original site and logo design is by Andy Markley - art101.com.