Citizens Tool Kit Black Box Voting - America's Elections Watchdog Group blackboxvoting.org - caught on videotape
blackboxvoting.org - New Today!
SHORTCUTS: How to find what you're looking for
your donations are always needed and very much appreciated Visa - Mastercard - AMEX blackboxvoting.org - news blackboxvoting.org - investigations blackboxvoting.org Press Kit blackboxvoting.org forums blackboxvoting.org - contact us blackboxvoting.org - home
Navigation
  Topics
  Log In
  Log Out
:
Special Search
  New Today
  New This Week
  Advanced Search
  Tree View

Your Account
  Edit Profile
  Register
  Forgot Password

Tools
  Help/Instructions
  Policies


  ...

CBS Report: 2000 Pres. Election mis-c...  
 

Black Box Voting » Document Archive » Reports and Studies » Other Reports » CBS Report: 2000 Pres. Election mis-called due to voting machine « Previous Next »

  Thread Last Poster Posts Pages Last Post
  Start New Thread        

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bev Harris
Board Administrator
Username: Admin

Post Number: 3968
Registered: 12-2004

Best of Black Box? 
Votes: 5 (A keeper?)

Posted on Wednesday, April 5, 2006 - 5:53 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

This report, quietly released by CBS after an internal investigation into how the election was erroneously called in 2000, gives a minute by minute description. Most chilling was the response to Dan Rather's concerns as to why the network had not pulled back its call for Bush, even after they knew that it was called erroneously, due to minus 16,022 votes uploaded in Volusia County, Florida.

http://www.blackboxvoting.org/CBSreport.pdf

When asked when they will pull the bad call for Bush, the president of CBS News, Andrew Heyward, wants to know what Gore is going to do. Gore had been misled into conceding the election to Bush based on the minus 16,022 Volusia County votes, and was in a car just two blocks away from conceding to the nation when he learned that the projected results were bogus.

This report shows that there is no question the election was wrongfully called due to Volusia County. It attributes them to some sort of glitch. It now appears more likely that a Volusia County memory card was tampered with to produce the number of votes needed to call the election for Bush, in hopes that Gore could be induced to concede prematurely.

In fall 2003, we revealed for the first time on this Web site that the real reason for the minus 16,022 votes was a replacement memory card. An internal memo from Diebold's master programmer, Talbot Iredale, points to the uncomfortable fact that there were two memory cards. The first results, the correct results, were uploaded from card #0. The minus 16,022 were uploaded from card #3. No one seems to be able to account for where memory card #3 came from or where it went after the fateful upload.

Here is the Talbot Iredale e-mail:
http://www.bbvdocs.org/FL/volusia/minus-16022/msg00069.html

Here are the earlier messages. Note the cryptic comment from John McLaurin as they try to figure out an explanation to offer auditors: "keeping in mind that the boogie man may me [sic] reading our mail."

http://www.bbvdocs.org/FL/volusia/minus-16022/msg00068.html

Note: The machines are now called Diebold, but were then called Global Election Systems. This is the AccuVote optical scan machine, the version that Harri Hursti hacked in Leon County, Florida on May 26 and Dec. 13, 2005.

The full set of the leaked Diebold e-mails and files here: http://www.bbvforums.org/forums/messages/7659/9447.html

Note that some of the most sensitive files were pruned out of the e-mails, either before they were leaked or by the individual who leaked them to me. The missing files contain a huge set of Georgia bug references from the "Rob Georgia" era, and the missing files include the original Volusia County minus 16,022 correspondence. Whoever pruned the files probably missed the Talbot Iredale and related correspondence linked above because, as you can see, the subject line had been changed. The missing files are either in the hands of the good guys, or the bad guys (in which case they may have been destroyed).
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Brant Lamb
Frequent Voting Rights Forum Participant
Username: Brantl

Post Number: 1682
Registered: 1-2005

Best of Black Box? N/A
Votes: 0 (A keeper?)

Posted on Wednesday, January 2, 2008 - 1:31 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

It would be nice to know if that precinct had only one ballot scanner, and what the population of the precinct is (does it exceed the positive integer limit of a signed number?) It also would be nice, if this is a multimachine accumulated result, to know if their software that totals the numbers, is using a signed integer or not, and seeing if it "rolls over" the counter (like an odometer with 999,999.99 with one additional 1/10th of a mile goes to all zeroes).

Hard to tell exactly what kind of use created this negative number (which shouldn't ever be allowed to happen in a voting machine, natch).
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bev Harris
Board Administrator
Username: Admin

Post Number: 7324
Registered: 12-2004

Best of Black Box? N/A
Votes: 0 (A keeper?)

Posted on Wednesday, January 2, 2008 - 1:57 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

The precinct had only a couple hundred legitimate voters. One scanner.

No multiple precinct machines, GEMS program may have been involved, look in the Florida forum, Glades County for a copy of the GEMS program in use at that time along with real vote databases from Glades County, 2004.

Memory card - Accuvote 1.94 - GEMS

Those are the moving parts. Citizens would like to see no moving parts.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Brant Lamb
Frequent Voting Rights Forum Participant
Username: Brantl

Post Number: 1695
Registered: 1-2005

Best of Black Box? N/A
Votes: 0 (A keeper?)

Posted on Monday, January 7, 2008 - 5:53 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

That pretty much blows all the accidental loopholes out of the situation, then.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

elaine w
Voting Rights Forum Participant
Username: Elaine_w

Post Number: 1
Registered: 1-2008

Best of Black Box? N/A
Votes: 0 (A keeper?)

Posted on Thursday, January 10, 2008 - 1:47 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Bev, i admire your activism. there is clearly a system of checks & balances that is missing in this system & no accountability, & there seems to be some conflict of interest going on. i'll help if there's anything that can be done.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Catherine Ansbro
Frequent Voting Rights Forum Participant
Username: Catherine_a

Post Number: 4309
Registered: 12-2004

Best of Black Box? N/A
Votes: 0 (A keeper?)

Posted on Thursday, January 10, 2008 - 1:59 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Hi Elaine,

The Citizens Tool Kit is a great place to start. There are lots of practical ideas and maybe something there will appeal to you.

Here's a direct link. (It's also on the BBV home page near the upper left.)

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Bold text Italics Underline Create a hyperlink Insert a clipart image

Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and moderators may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:
 

The public must be able to see and authenticate these four essential steps for an election to be public, democratic, and valid: (1) Who can vote (voter list); (2) Who did vote (3) The original count; (4) Chain of custody.